Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio as a Predictor of the Risk of Death in Severe Cases of COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: Identifying clinical characteristics and risk factors, comorbid conditions, and complications arising from SARS-CoV-2 infection is important to predict the progression to more severe forms of the disease among hospitalized individuals to enable timely intervention and to prevent fatal outcomes. The aim of the study is to assess the possible role of the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as a biomarker of the risk of death in patients with comorbidities hospitalized with COVID-19 in a tertiary hospital in southern Brazil. METHODS: This is a prospective cohort study on patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection admitted to a hospital in the metropolitan region of Porto Alegre from September 2020 to March 2022. RESULTS: The sample consisted of 185 patients with associated comorbidities, namely, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, obesity, cardiovascular, pulmonary, and renal diseases, hospitalized with COVID-19. Of these, 78 died and 107 were discharged alive. The mean age was 66.5 years for the group that died and 60.1 years for the group discharged. Statistical analysis revealed that a difference greater than or equal to 1.55 in the NLR, from hospitalization to the 5th day, was associated with a relative risk of death greater than 2. CONCLUSIONS: Measuring a simple inflammatory marker such as NLR may improve the risk stratification of comorbid patients with COVID-19 and can be considered a useful biomarker.

Influence of radiologic pattern and the presence of diffuse parenchymal lung disease on outcome in ventilated patients with COVID-19 pneumonia: impact on prognosis.

BACKGROUND: Suspected organising pneumonia (OP) is a common finding in patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), but the impact on outcomes of the radiological patterns of diffuse parenchymal lung disease on outcome of these patients is still uncertain. AIMS: Investigate the presence of radiological images compatible with OP and its association with clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19 submitted to invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). METHODS: Retrospective, unicentric cohort study composed of patients who required IMV and underwent chest computerized tomography to investigate secondary complications of COVID-19. We compared patients with radiological findings characteristic of suspected OP with those without this condition. The main outcome was hospital mortality. RESULTS: Two hundred and ten patients were included, and 65 had signals compatible with OP. All patients with suspected OP were treated with corticosteroids. There was no difference in IVM-free days until day 28 between the groups (median, 0 days; interquartile range [IQR], 0-14.8) in the group with suspected OP vs 0 days (IQR, 0-11) in the group without suspected OP (P = 0.14). In univariate analysis, the presence of suspected OP was associated with lower hospital mortality; however, after correction for potential confounding variables, it was not associated with the outcome, even after matching by propensity score in patients without this condition. CONCLUSION: OP radiologic pattern in patients with severe COVID-19 is not associated with worse outcomes.

Treatment of severe COVID-19 patients with either low- or high-volume of convalescent plasma versus standard of care: A multicenter Bayesian randomized open-label clinical trial (COOP-COVID-19-MCTI).

Background: Administration of convalescent plasma may serve as an adjunct to supportive treatment to prevent COVID-19 progression and death. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 2 volumes of intravenous convalescent plasma (CP) with high antibody titers for the treatment of severe cases of COVID-19. Methods: We conducted a Bayesian, randomized, open-label, multicenter, controlled clinical trial in 7 Brazilian hospitals. Adults admitted to hospital with positive RT-PCR for SARS-CoV2, within 10 days of the symptom onset, were eligible. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive standard of care (SoC) alone, or in combination with 200 mL (150-300 mL) of CP (Low-volume), or 400 mL (300-600 mL) of CP (High-volume); infusion had to be performed within 24 h of randomization. Randomization was centralized, stratified by center. The primary outcome was the time until clinical improvement up to day 28, measured by the WHO ten-point scale, assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Interim and terminal analyses were performed in a Bayesian framework. Trial registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04415086. Findings: Between June 2, 2020, and November 18, 2020, 129 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to SoC (n = 42), Low-volume (n = 43) or High-volume (n = 44) CP. Donors presented a median titer of neutralizing antibodies of 1:320 (interquartile range, 1:160 to 1:1088). No evidence of any benefit of convalescent plasma was observed, with Bayesian estimate of 28-day clinical improvement of 72.7% (95%CI, 58.8 to 84.7) in the SoC versus 64.1% (95%ci, 53.8 to 73.7) in the pooled experimental groups (mean difference of -8.7%, 95%CI, -24.6 to 8.2). There was one case of cutaneous mild allergic reaction related to plasma transfusion and one case of suspected transfusion-related acute lung injury but deemed not to be related to convalescent plasma infusion. Interpretation: In this prospective, randomized trial of adult hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19, convalescent plasma was not associated with clinical benefits. Funding: Brazilian Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation, Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo.

Negative results for ketamine use in severe acute bronchospasm: a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Ketamine has bronchodilation properties. The aim of the single-centre, evaluator-blinded, randomised clinical trial study was to evaluate whether continuous infusion of ketamine is associated with improvement in respiratory mechanics correlated with bronchospasm relief, as compared with continuous infusion of fentanyl. METHODS: Adult patients submitted to invasive mechanical ventilation were included if they had an acute severe bronchospasm, due to status asthmaticus or COPD exacerbation. They were randomised to ketamine or a standard IV analgesia with fentanyl, both in bolus and continuous infusion. Measurements of respiratory mechanics (airway resistance - Rsmax, dynamic compliance - Cdyn and intrinsic PEEP - PEEPi) both at baseline and 3 and 24 h after randomisation were performed. The main outcome of this study was to evaluate the improvement of Rsmax in 3 h of continuous infusion of the study drugs. RESULTS: Ketamine use was not associated with greater reduction in Rsmax when compared with fentanyl, either after 3 h (0 cm H2O L-1 s-1 ± 6 vs. -3 cm H2O L-1 s-1 ± 7.7, respectively; P = 0.16) or after 24 h (-3 cm H2O L-1 s-1 ± 17 vs. -3.5 cm H2O L-1 s-1 ± 13.7, respectively; P = 0.73). Patients randomized to the ketamine group did not have better improvements in delta PEEPi as compared with fentanyl in 3 h (P = 0.77) or in 24 h (P = 0.72). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, ketamine use was not associated with improvement in ventilatory variables associated with bronchospasm.